Digital InfrastructureMarch 31, 20263 min read

Can Cooperatives Bridge Indonesia's Digital Divide? The Reality of Building Telecom Networks

Intan from Orbitcore

Intan

from Orbitcore Editorial

In a move that could potentially reshape Indonesia's digital landscape, the conversation around who gets to build our telecommunications infrastructure is shifting. For a long time, we’ve associated massive internet towers and fiber optic cables with giant corporations. However, recent insights into the nation's regulatory framework remind us that the door is actually wide open for grassroots organizations—specifically, cooperatives.

According to Law Number 36 of 1999 concerning Telecommunications, the ability to obtain licenses for network or service provision isn't exclusive to massive legal entities or limited liability companies (PT). Ian Joseph Matheus Edward, a respected lecturer from the School of Electrical Engineering and Informatics at the Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB), recently highlighted that the law is surprisingly inclusive. It allows not just cooperatives, but also foundations and even individuals to step into the role of telecommunications providers.

While the law has been on the books for years, the practical reality has seen most providers structured as limited liability companies. This isn't just about prestige; it’s about governance. Having a clear corporate structure ensures that responsibilities are well-defined and that there is a transparent system of accountability—something that is crucial when you are managing infrastructure that an entire community relies on.

The Merah Putih Funding Catalyst

The discussion has gained fresh momentum with the government’s plan to inject significant funding into the 'Merah Putih' cooperative program. This financial backing presents a unique window of opportunity for cooperatives to move beyond traditional retail or agricultural sectors and dive into the high-tech world of digital infrastructure. On paper, it sounds like a perfect solution for rural connectivity: local cooperatives building local networks for their own members.

Orbitcore Web Dev

Your brand deserves a better website.

We don't just use templates. We build custom web apps, landing pages, and company profiles designed specifically for what you need.

The Sustainability Hurdle

However, being legally allowed to build a network and being operationally capable of maintaining one are two very different things. Ian Joseph Matheus Edward warns that legal permission does not automatically translate into business success. The primary concern is sustainability. Building a network is a capital-intensive project, but maintaining it requires a constant stream of investment and technical expertise.

"The issue isn't whether it's legally permissible, but whether cooperatives can sustain their network or telecommunications services operations," Ian pointed out. This is a critical warning. If a cooperative starts a project but runs out of steam or capital halfway through, the infrastructure becomes 'idle.' Even worse, if a service goes live and then fails, it is the public and the local members who will suffer from the lack of connectivity and lost investment.

Lessons from a Consolidating Industry

If we look at the broader history of the telecommunications industry in Indonesia, the path forward for cooperatives looks even more challenging. The market has undergone significant consolidation over the last decade. We’ve seen the number of mobile operators shrink from seven players down to just four, and now we are essentially looking at three major dominant players.

This trend isn't a coincidence; it is a reflection of the massive capital requirements and the sophisticated business capabilities needed to thrive in this space. To grow sustainably, a provider needs more than just a license; they need the financial muscle to weather technological shifts and the operational scale to keep costs manageable. For cooperatives to succeed where even some large companies have failed, they will need to bring a high level of professionalism and long-term strategic planning to the table.

Discussion (0)